Recent News
- Exploring Personal Experience and Value Creation in Postdigital Education: Insights from a Large-Scale MOOC Survey.
- Data for Learning in Engineering Education
- Enhancing quality assurance in continuing education through an organisational cultural change
- Impact of MOOC and other online course development on campus education
- Online professional development across institutions and borders
Tags
Archives
- September 2024
- June 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- June 2023
- March 2023
- September 2022
- July 2022
- May 2022
- March 2022
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- October 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- July 2018
- January 2018
- April 2017
- February 2017
- December 2016
- October 2016
- August 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- February 2016
- July 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- September 2014
- August 2014
- September 2013
Meta information
- TU Delft>
- TU Weblog>
- Online Learning Research>
- EDM2015: Modeling Learners’ Social Centrality and Performance through Language and Discourse
EDM2015: Modeling Learners’ Social Centrality and Performance through Language and Discourse
This paper is presented at the Educational Data Mining Conference 2015 in Madrid, Spain.
Abstract
There is an emerging trend in higher education for the adoption of massive open online courses (MOOCs). However, despite this interest in learning at scale, there has been limited work investigating the impact MOOCs can play on student learning. In this study, we adopt a novel approach, using language and discourse as a tool to explore its association with two established measures of learning: traditional academic performance and social centrality. We demonstrate how characteristics of language diagnostically reveal the performance and social position of learners as they interact in a MOOC. We use Coh-Metrix, a theoretically grounded, computational linguistic modeling tool, to explore students’ forum postings across five potent discourse dimensions. Using a Social Network Analysis (SNA) methodology, we determine learners’ social centrality. Linear mixed-effect modeling is used for all other analyses to control for individual learner and text characteristics. The results indicate that learners performed significantly better when they engaged in more expository style discourse, with surface and deep level cohesive integration, abstract language, and simple syntactic structures. However, measures of social centrality revealed a different picture. Learners garnered a more significant and central position in their social network when they engaged with more narrative style discourse with less overlap between words and ideas, simpler syntactic structures and abstract words. Implications for further research and practice are discussed regarding the misalignment between these two learning-related outcomes.
Comments are closed.